What Goes Around, Comes Around
Feb. 5th, 2003 11:40 amCheck out this URL
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/8004.easterbrook-fulltext.html
Interesting article from 1980. Actually, the shuttle did recover at least one satellite if I remember correctly.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/8004.easterbrook-fulltext.html
Interesting article from 1980. Actually, the shuttle did recover at least one satellite if I remember correctly.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-05 05:51 am (UTC)But the Space Transportation System is, it must be admitted, a pale shadow of what it should have been, what it was meant to be. And I doubt they'll give the money now to build Shuttle II.
Depends on perspective
Date: 2003-02-05 06:17 am (UTC)Apart from some hyperbole, much of what he said is pretty accurate - even now, looking at the "pesimistic" prediction of "only" 200 flights in 10 years. We've had 113 in 20 years.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-05 06:28 am (UTC)They need a smaller vehicle for passenger runs.
no subject
One of the USAF requirements was that the shuttle had to be able to do single polar orbit put-ups out of Vandenberg and have enough lateral range to get back to Edwards. Of course, the shuttle was never launched from Vandenberg (Mark Wade suggests it would have been destroyed by the over-pressure generated in the launch silo), so that constraint placed unnecessary limits on the shuttle. I'm pretty sure there are no USAF flights anymore. I doubt there's much a spaceplane can do that U2s and Auroras plus drones can't do.